Independent measurement. Shared progress.

Help people and AI work better together.

We’re building the independent yardstick for AI collaboration, with open standards and practical tools to make it measurable, teachable, and governable.

PAICE.work PBC is a mission-oriented, for-profit Public Benefit Corporation.

Why this matters

Better AI is only part of the possibility.

What we can accomplish depends on how we work together. A learner needs useful feedback. A teacher needs a way to recognize progress. People making consequential decisions need evidence they can trust.

Our bet is that better collaboration compounds. Clearer intent, earned trust, and shared practices can improve today’s result and make the next collaboration more effective. PAICE.work PBC makes that possibility something we can investigate and build on.

Work you can explore

A mission with work behind it.

Different capabilities, one purpose: help people understand, improve, and trust the work they do with AI.

The human side · PAICE.work

A snapshot of collaboration skill.

The PAICE.work assessment examines how a person works with AI. Its purpose is to make human-side collaboration skill observable.

  • PAICE.work
  • AI Posture
Explore human collaboration
The agentic web · Siteline

Make the agentic web scoreable.

One website at a time, Siteline examines whether agents can use the web on our behalf. Graceful Boundaries helps make operational limits understandable.

  • Siteline
  • Graceful Boundaries
  • Knowledge-as-Code
Explore the agentic web
An evidence-checkable domain · Legal Graph

Connect the claim to its source.

Legal obligations, public matters, and publication records provide a practical domain for checking AI-assisted work against evidence.

  • Every AI Law
  • PubLedge
  • AI Incident Law
  • Obligation First
Explore the Legal Graph
Inspectable collaboration · AIDR + Turnfile

Keep the reasoning on the record.

Portable records preserve positions, objections, and the human decision. Session protocols carry that accountability through ongoing work.

  • AIDR
  • Turnfile
  • GuideCheck
  • Skill Provenance
  • Graceful Boundaries
  • Knowledge-as-Code
Explore inspectable collaboration

An example you can inspect

How a standard was ratified.

AIDR’s own specification decision is a published record of reviewers’ positions, disclosures, and Sam’s arbitration.

It shows a decision trail. Whether the method improves outcomes remains a question to test.

aidr / AIDR-0002 · July 2, 2026

Should the specification be ratified?
  • The question and review context
  • Positions and reviewer disclosures
  • The human decision
Read the actual decision record

Research & resources

Explore the thinking behind the work.

Papers, briefs and design principles make the ideas available for inspection, discussion and use.

The design principles · 2026-07

The Aggregated Intelligence Tenets

Eight principles beneath Turnfile and AIDR, including preserved disagreement and human accountability.

Read, listen, or watch.

The Aggregated Intelligence brief is available in several formats.

These works record the thinking at their publication dates. The current portfolio direction is described on this site.

What we’re committed to

Trust has to be earned.

Independent measurement.

A useful yardstick serves the people being measured as well as those making decisions. Our methods should be open to inspection.

Human agency.

Intent, disagreement, and authority belong in the record. Model agreement can inform a decision; people remain accountable for it.

Shared foundations.

We adopt existing work where it meets the need, contribute where we can, and build to fill real gaps. Wider adoption matters more than keeping a separate project alive.

Evidence changes what we pursue

What we stopped, and why.

Archived experiment

Tokenese: an experiment we stopped

We explored whether a purpose-built language could make AI-to-AI communication more compact and precise. Its flagship example used more tokens than concise English, and the broader benefit remained unvalidated. We stopped investing and published the evidence, limitations, and conditions for reconsideration.

We also corrected our own post-mortem when its conclusion went beyond the evidence.

Read the findings and post-mortem
Sam Rogers, founder of PAICE.work PBC

The person behind the work

Hi, I’m Sam Rogers.

In facilitation, I’ve seen better collaboration do more than improve one result. It builds trust and ways of working that make the next collaboration more effective.

PAICE.work PBC is where I’m pursuing that possibility with AI in the mix. I’m looking for people who want to help make the work useful, rigorous, and lasting.

More about my background · Connect on LinkedIn

Make a contribution

Help build a yardstick worth trusting.

Your support can sustain independent development, strengthen the evidence, and bring this work into real settings.

Fund the independent work.

Explore mission-aligned funding, the capacity it could sustain, and the next useful milestone we could pursue together.

Talk with Sam about funding

Bring your expertise.

Research, build, review, or combine efforts on a shared mission. Start with where our strengths could make a useful difference.

Explore working together

Bring a real workflow.

Have a recurring task where collaboration matters? Explore a pilot with a clear result and people who can judge its usefulness.

Discuss a possible pilot

A short note about your interest is enough to begin. We’ll start with what matters to you, look at the relevant work, and identify a useful next step. You can also write directly to hello@paice.work.

Explore our current public work 13 components, with their roles and destinations.

PAICE.work

A snapshot of human-AI collaboration skill on the human end.

Explore PAICE.work

Siteline

Making the agentic web scoreable, one website at a time.

Explore Siteline

Every AI Law

Structured references to AI-related obligations and their sources, connected through the Legal Graph.

Explore Every AI Law

Graceful Boundaries

Discoverable limits, understandable refusals and useful next steps for humans and agents. An enabling standard for Siteline.

Explore Graceful Boundaries

Skill Provenance

Portable identity, integrity and version history that help make work with agent skills governable.

Explore Skill Provenance

Turnfile

Session-scale coordination with recorded positions, preserved disagreement and human resolution.

Explore Turnfile

AIDR

One portable decision record for the question, positions, objections and human decision.

Explore AIDR

Knowledge-as-Code

Open infrastructure for simple human and machine legibility of structured knowledge.

Explore Knowledge-as-Code

AI Posture

Aggregated Intelligence Posture: a supporting framework for understanding and communicating aggregated intelligence. Practical applications remain to be developed.

Explore AI Posture

PubLedge

Open recordkeeping conventions for fact-specific interpretations and administrative issuance records.

Explore PubLedge

AI Incident Law

Public-record legal and regulatory matters involving AI, with allegations and outcomes kept distinct.

Explore AI Incident Law

Obligation First

The shared vocabulary and validation contract connecting the Legal Graph while preserving each source's meaning.

Explore Obligation First

GuideCheck

Human-reviewable installation instructions, designed to make delegated software installation inspectable. Conformance does not guarantee safety.

Explore GuideCheck